Search results

In complexity theory, it isn't enough to say that something is impossible; you have to ''prove'' it. So he

On this page I've collected terms that appear (or don't appear) throughout the Complexity Zoo, and that theoretical computer scient ...ertain property. I.e. if an input doesn't have that property, then we don't care what the algorithm does when given that input.

{{CZ-Letter-Section|T}}

...hould consult the references. I hope that non-theorists, even if they don't understand everything, will at least find some amusement in the many exotic

...ace}}; that is, that for polynomially-bounded space, non-determinism doesn't buy us anything, in contrast to what we suspect about polynomially-bounded

...2, \dots, x_k)\in I</math>, <math>R\left(h(x_1, x_2, \dots, x_k)\right)\in T</math>?

...exity of sampling from probability distributions for years, but they haven't tended to organize those distributions into <i>classes</i> designated by <i

...special symbols to be in <math>\Gamma</math>, but for our purposes, we won't worry with any such additional symbols. ...e make no statement about needing to be able to prove that a string <i>isn't</i> in an NP language. More precisely, if we have a Boolean function <math>

<!-- don't delete blank lines above this.. they're there for spacing reasons --> D. Aharonov and T. Naveh.