Difference between revisions of "Zoo Operators"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→BP: Bounded-error probability (two-sided): `existsbpp` is under E, not B.) |
|||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
* <math>BP\cdot </math> P = BPP. | * <math>BP\cdot </math> P = BPP. | ||
* <math>BP \cdot NP = AM</math> | * <math>BP \cdot NP = AM</math> | ||
− | * <math>\exists \cdot BPP = MA</math> (not to be confused with [[Complexity Zoo: | + | * <math>\exists \cdot BPP = MA</math> (not to be confused with [[Complexity Zoo:E#existsbpp|<math>\exists</math>BPP]]!) |
---- | ---- |
Latest revision as of 19:40, 30 September 2024
co: Complements
Definition: A language L is in if is in .
Properties:
Prominent examples: .
: Existential (polynomial)
Definition: A language L is in if there exists a polynomial p and a language such that, for all strings , is in L if and only if there exists a string y, of length such that .
Properties:
- and vice versa.
Prominent examples: P = NP.
: Universal (polynomial)
Definition: A language L is in if there exists a polynomial p and a language such that, for all strings , is in L if and only if for all strings y of length such that .
Properties:
- and vice versa.
Prominent examples: P = coNP
BP: Bounded-error probability (two-sided)
Definition: A language L is in if there exists a polynomial p and a language such that, for all strings , .
Properties:
- If is closed under majority reductions, then admits probability amplification, so we get , and we can replace the probability of 3/4 with for any constant (i.e., independent of the input size |x|) , as well as with .
- If is closed under majority reductions, then .
- If is closed under majority reductions, then .
- Note that, because of the semantic nature of the defining condition for the BP operator, it is possible that some languages do not define a language using the defining formula above. Only those V which satisfy the required condition can be used.
Prominent examples:
- P = BPP.
- (not to be confused with BPP!)